writing this against my own thoughts, something goes wrong in my thinking, everything is too assured & implacable & deaf
i think have too much regard for my authority on the complex of emotion / cognition / sensation => reaction / event => history & potential + milieu variously addressed as 'me', 'my life', and as a certain fragmentary permutation of 'human nature' or 'reality' or 'the universe'
a privileged vantage does not imply infallibility or even accuracy, why can't i really understand this
i am often wary => therefore dismissive of interpretive biography -- are the foundations & inner invisible arrangement of X really so & so explicable? -- without considering that anything X could write of it would be equally false, or equally true: it can't be evaluated
it is an observer effect kind of
it is a problem of simulation / embodiment
a thought process is examined by other thought processes, which displace the thought process and 'beg the question'
feeling bad about 'how i am', generally / habitually / conclusively, is an arrogance i think, and it implies a sort of comprehensive study / refined intuition i am frankly incapable of
at this point overly dramatic thoughts occur to me, lurid:
- 'self' is a false construction, held only under fevered contortion
- and self-reflection is really another sort of perception, like sight or memory
- and the miasmic unlifting condemnation / precipitating taxonomy i see myself refracted thru is just the obscurent inverse after-image of once catching something in me too horribly bright but which has now safely set
in symbols
i) the derivative of time == is ==> disintegration
ii) and this moment == is ==> never going to happen again
iii) ∴ my feeling bad about 'how i am' == manifests ==> the historian's fallacy
and okay this post is too much
No comments:
Post a Comment